The government can no longer take for granted public support for Net Zero

Harry Wilkinson

January 5, 2022

The government has lazily taken the public’s support of its Net Zero agenda for granted. While its ambition to reduce emissions and improve environmental standards is broadly supported, when people are confronted with the prospect of higher taxes and more expensive energy bills, this support starts to evaporate. The public cannot be fooled. They simply will not accept the substantial and growing costs of decarbonisation.

New polling that we commissioned at Net Zero Watch bears this out. When asked if they were willing to pay higher taxes to help reach Net Zero targets, 58 per cent of British adults said they were not willing to do so, with only 34 per cent saying they were willing. Equally concerning for the Government is the broader economic context of rising inflation and in particular, energy bills. A total of 70 per cent of respondents said they were concerned about the financial impact of increased energy costs.

People rightly want to leave the environment in a better state, but this does not mean they support the finer detail of government policy. At present, while advocates of Net Zero point to its inclusion in the 2019 Conservative manifesto, the public are still being introduced to the idea that they may have to abandon their petrol cars and gas boilers, as well as reduce their meat consumption.

Many people resent these suggestions, and few feel that there has been much of a public conversation about what Net Zero should mean. Just 18 per cent of people we asked said that they felt the public had been given enough of a say, compared to 65 per cent who thought they hadn’t.

Environmental policies are quickly becoming a new dividing line within the post-Brexit political landscape. A letter from the new Net Zero Scrutiny Group of MPs made headlines for its demand that VAT and green levies should be scrapped from bills. These levies now cost in excess of £10 billion a year.

Removing these from consumers bills would be of most benefit to the poorest, in stark contrast to grants for EVs and air source heat pumps which overwhelmingly go to the rich. It is not surprising then, that just a fifth of people expected to benefit personally from grants for EVs and heat pumps in our survey, in comparison to the over 60 per cent of people who did not expect to benefit.

What is so frustrating is that people shouldn’t have to be paying to go green at all, because environmental objectives can be achieved while cutting costs for consumers at the same time. But they are already paying more because of badly designed policies.

The energy market is now privatised in name only, with the government having effective control over which generation technologies get built and how much consumers pay. They have chosen to promote dangerously unreliable wind and solar, while blocking domestic production of gas. The result is that consumers in the UK are facing some of the highest energy prices in the world.

Ultimately, lofty climate change targets will always be trumped by economic concerns in terms of the public’s priorities. If you are having to choose between heating and eating this winter, the emissions intensity of your electricity is likely to be a second order concern. Unless the government can deliver low energy prices for consumers and properly engage the public in a conversation about how Net Zero ought to be achieved, they will face a reckoning.

Author

Written by Harry Wilkinson

Harry Wilkinson is Head of Policy at Net Zero Watch

3 comments

  1. “What is so frustrating is that people shouldn’t have to be paying to go green at all, because environmental objectives can be achieved while cutting costs for consumers at the same time”.

    This strikes me as an out-of-place conclusion. There is nowhere in the world where “green” has been accomplished simultaneous with “cutting costs”. This is likely because we’re insisting on accelerating a conversion from fossil fuels that will happen eventually (assuming it really can provide energy cheaply, which will probably require nukes of some sort). It’s the ACCELERATION that costs money, like all acceleration.

    You’d think that any country that bills itself a “democracy” would have had serious discussions and debates about the SCIENCE and the ECONOMICS of “climate change” and Net Zero. I guess I haven’t been paying attention, because I can’t point to a single debate where the skeptics have “lost the argument”.

  2. Ill conceived anti fossil fuel carbon tax and other increasing tax policies are being unapologetically imposed by the Irish government and led by the miniscule Green party. These increases have been a major contributor to Irish inflation of 5.7% and rising ,one of the highest in EU , affecting the elderly and poorest hardest as welfare and pensions remain practically static in the face of spiralling across the board energy costs .
    A major undercurrent of unpopularity has recently substantially reduced the popularity of all the 3 parties in the Irish coalition Government including the 2 Conservative parties FF and FG.
    Social and Political unrest is growing and the mainly left leaning Opposition parties have shown recent large poll increases .
    This is likely to be the major and volatile issue on the political agenda in Ireland over the remaining cold winter months as serious fuel poverty and its serious consequences are now a growing concern across society

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


  • SHARE

Capitalism and freedom are under attack. If you support 1828’s work, help us champion freedom by donating here.


Keep Reading

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR

WEEKLY NEWS BRIEFING

Sign up today to receive exclusive insights